Posts by: Guest 1
Discounted EVA approach
I am attempting to apply an EVA (Economic Value-added) approach to measure value creation over a series of years. I am wondering if you can help validate whether the approach below is sound. The copy-and-paste function does not properly align the #s, but basically i simply multiply averageinvested... Read More
I am attempting to apply an EVA (Economic Value-added) approach to measure value creation over a series of years. I am wondering if you can help validate whether the approach below is sound. The copy-and-paste function does not properly align the #s, but basically i simply multiply averageinvested... Read More
trading comps for private placements, vcs, IPOs?
Is there such a thing as private placement comps (I believe usually the equity injection/investment is provided, but not TEV or debt involved)? What would the valuation methods for an IPO be?
Is there such a thing as private placement comps (I believe usually the equity injection/investment is provided, but not TEV or debt involved)? What would the valuation methods for an IPO be?
Trading Comps overview class
Hi,
So pratically speaking, when should we adjust for the impairment of assets? Because some companies here had this charge in the IS and we didn't adjust for them. So, what are the circumstances where an adjustment is required?
Cheers.
Hi,
So pratically speaking, when should we adjust for the impairment of assets? Because some companies here had this charge in the IS and we didn't adjust for them. So, what are the circumstances where an adjustment is required?
Cheers.
Discount rate when FCFF = FCFE
Suppose a company ceases or dramatically slows its capex such that Op Cash Flow approximates FCF (and assume there are no changes in working capital) and enjoys a perpetual stream of relatively steady cash flows from its existsing asset base without the need to heavily reinvest (e.g. this would be a... Read More
Suppose a company ceases or dramatically slows its capex such that Op Cash Flow approximates FCF (and assume there are no changes in working capital) and enjoys a perpetual stream of relatively steady cash flows from its existsing asset base without the need to heavily reinvest (e.g. this would be a... Read More
Enhancements to the core model- Part II EVA analysis
Hi, I am watching the video - EVA analysis. The total capital (debt + equity) figures that you provided in the downloaded template are different from the figures that are showing in your template on the video. Thus, I have a different valuation base on the downloaded template. For 2006, the figure ... Read More
Hi, I am watching the video - EVA analysis. The total capital (debt + equity) figures that you provided in the downloaded template are different from the figures that are showing in your template on the video. Thus, I have a different valuation base on the downloaded template. For 2006, the figure ... Read More
Accounting: ROC
For ROC ratio,
Net Income + Interest / Equity + Debt,
the interest in numerator, is that interest expense or interest income?
If it's interest expense, then it's actually being subtracted from net income, correct?
Please advise. Thanks
For ROC ratio,
Net Income + Interest / Equity + Debt,
the interest in numerator, is that interest expense or interest income?
If it's interest expense, then it's actually being subtracted from net income, correct?
Please advise. Thanks
Interest expense on Converts
If we did not adjust for the dilutive effect of convertible notes, shouldn't we had to adjust the numerator of the diluted EPS since this is calculated assuming the notes were converted and as such the interest expense on converts was added back to NI (as per p.25 on COSTCO's 10Q)? I appreciate y... Read More
If we did not adjust for the dilutive effect of convertible notes, shouldn't we had to adjust the numerator of the diluted EPS since this is calculated assuming the notes were converted and as such the interest expense on converts was added back to NI (as per p.25 on COSTCO's 10Q)? I appreciate y... Read More
Ev calc? Inlcude postretirement liab's and pension liab's?
I am looking at CTB and need help clarifying whether I should include the company postretirement liab's as part of net debt when calculating net debt. The company is underfunded and the inclusion, or exclusion of these liablities will have a significant impact to it's EV calc and the company's asso... Read More
I am looking at CTB and need help clarifying whether I should include the company postretirement liab's as part of net debt when calculating net debt. The company is underfunded and the inclusion, or exclusion of these liablities will have a significant impact to it's EV calc and the company's asso... Read More
RE: Capital leases revisited x2
Capital leases are capital leases b/c the accountants said so. Else they would be operating leases and off-balance sheet. Operating leases are generally not added back to debt for valuation purposes as they are considered operating in nature and not capital structure in nature. See above question on... Read More
Capital leases are capital leases b/c the accountants said so. Else they would be operating leases and off-balance sheet. Operating leases are generally not added back to debt for valuation purposes as they are considered operating in nature and not capital structure in nature. See above question on... Read More
Hi, (1). Sorry, but I still don’t see logic and consistence in the converts explanation. We are analyzing the convertibility of the security as of TODAY, and in my view, and as also expressed in a previous post here, as of TODAY, it is in-the-money, and as such, should assume conversion (as the... Hi,
(1). Sorry, but I still don’t see logic and consistence in the converts explanation. We are analyzing the convertibility of the security as of TODAY, and in my view, and as also expressed in a previous post here, as of TODAY, it is in-the-money, and as such, should assume conversion (as the basic rule for dilutive securities). So, WST argues that if the maturity was tomorrow or the share price drops tomorrow a investor would not convert – but for me, in essence, it is a subjective thinking (one cannot be imagining if something was tomorrow what would have happened…) We are analyzing it as of TODAY and have to decide to convert it or not based on what we have TODAY (Present Value and current share price).
(2). So, repeating the question of a previous post (that I’m not sure was answered in full), why is the future value (i.e., face value) of convertibles compared to the market value of shares? (since we actually need to compare Present Value vs. Present Value and Future Value vs. Future Value)?
(3). Independently of the different points of view, what should we consider in terms of numbers, to decide if it is in-the-money or out-the-money: PV of Convertibles (as stated on BS) vs. market value of equivalent shares, or Face Value of Convertibles (the FV/par value) vs. market value of equivalent shares?
(4). If converted, the adjustments would be:
A. Reduce debt by the amount stated on the BS (PV of face value)
B. Increase book value of equity by the equivalent number of shares converted x current stock price
C. Add the equivalent number of shares to the basic shares Outstanding
Am I missing any adjustment here?
(5). Also, Could you please confirm if the new book value of equity should be increased by the amount of book value of the convertible bonds (now excluded from debt on the BS) or by the market value of the equivalent number of shares (current stock price x equivalent number of shares that were converted)?
(6). Sorry, but in the previous answer WST mentioned that “what costco shares suddenly dropped the next day? then it is suddenly out of the money and one wouldn't convert;” – it is the sane thing for options – one can wait and decide to convert the options until it expires because may believe the share price can go up. And anyway we convert it, because our analysis is as of TODAY and does not include the subjective factor of thinking in the “timing” of this and that. It seems to me by assuming this for the converts, we are adopting two different criteria for the same thing. Does that make sense for you guys?
I appreciate your help in these questions.
Thanks again.
Cheers. Read More