Posts by: WST Expert 1
Re: Minority Interest To the CF
Yes, we made an assumption that the MI was paid out in cash to the minority interest shareholders. If you would like to alter that assumption and say that the MI was NOT paid out in cash, then you would do the following to make sure you balance: on the BS: increase MI account by the amount of MI not... Read More
Yes, we made an assumption that the MI was paid out in cash to the minority interest shareholders. If you would like to alter that assumption and say that the MI was NOT paid out in cash, then you would do the following to make sure you balance: on the BS: increase MI account by the amount of MI not... Read More
RE: Do you include pension liability in firm value?
Generally, in a standalone valuation context, such as a trading comps analysis, unfunded pension liabilities are not adjusted for. Trading comps attempt to quantify the current market valuation parameters. Unfunded pension liabilities are not considered part of the capital structure as it is not a f... Read More
Generally, in a standalone valuation context, such as a trading comps analysis, unfunded pension liabilities are not adjusted for. Trading comps attempt to quantify the current market valuation parameters. Unfunded pension liabilities are not considered part of the capital structure as it is not a f... Read More
Re: deal comps: calc/finding out EV v Eq Value, & liabilities
1) for stock deals (buying the stock of the target, not using stock to pay for it), assume that all liabilities are assumed. the issue only arises with asset deals, in which case, you'll do your best 2) discerning TEV vs Equity Value is challenging because the financial journalists out there need ... Read More
1) for stock deals (buying the stock of the target, not using stock to pay for it), assume that all liabilities are assumed. the issue only arises with asset deals, in which case, you'll do your best 2) discerning TEV vs Equity Value is challenging because the financial journalists out there need ... Read More
Circular Reference Explained (Summary)
Many folks have asked us to quickly summary in as succinct a manner as possible the reason why a circular reference is required in financial modeling. Recall, a circ is when a cell needs itself to calculate itself. In general, the only reason for a circ is as follows: - End balance of debt and cash ... Read More
Many folks have asked us to quickly summary in as succinct a manner as possible the reason why a circular reference is required in financial modeling. Recall, a circ is when a cell needs itself to calculate itself. In general, the only reason for a circ is as follows: - End balance of debt and cash ... Read More
RE: Free Cash Flow to Firm vs. Free Cash Flow to Equity
In general, free cash flow to equity is a useless number. Free cash flow to firm is by far the superior method over free cash flow to equity. Free cash flow to firm takes into the account the capital structure differences between two companies, again per the enterprise value and equity value relatio... Read More
In general, free cash flow to equity is a useless number. Free cash flow to firm is by far the superior method over free cash flow to equity. Free cash flow to firm takes into the account the capital structure differences between two companies, again per the enterprise value and equity value relatio... Read More
RE: Accounting: Files available for Download
sorry, nevermind, I just realized that it is in Part II under Key Ratios.
and by the way, you have a nice way of putting accounting, this is definitely more interesting and applicable than what I remember from the courses that I took in college.
sorry, nevermind, I just realized that it is in Part II under Key Ratios.
and by the way, you have a nice way of putting accounting, this is definitely more interesting and applicable than what I remember from the courses that I took in college.
Re: Free cash flow yield
As long as we are talking Free Cash Flow to Firm! Your question seems to have a blend of Free Cash Flow to Firm and Free Cash Flow to Equity. We want unlevered cash flow, so your interest payments are out of there. Free Cash Flow to Equity, something we highly discourage use of, includes debt repaym... Read More
As long as we are talking Free Cash Flow to Firm! Your question seems to have a blend of Free Cash Flow to Firm and Free Cash Flow to Equity. We want unlevered cash flow, so your interest payments are out of there. Free Cash Flow to Equity, something we highly discourage use of, includes debt repaym... Read More
Re: trading comps for private placements, vcs, IPOs?
yes, you'd have to get a database of PIPE deals, etc.
valuation methods for IPO = whatever institutional investors are willing to pay.
that is determined by comps, DCF, etc. everything in the Corporate Valuation course.
but look at LinkedIn - sometimes deals are mis-priced
yes, you'd have to get a database of PIPE deals, etc.
valuation methods for IPO = whatever institutional investors are willing to pay.
that is determined by comps, DCF, etc. everything in the Corporate Valuation course.
but look at LinkedIn - sometimes deals are mis-priced
Re: net debt and debt to total cpaital
Net Debt to Total Capital is a mis-matched ratio. It should be Net Debt to Net Capital. References to Equity are Shareholders Equity (Book Value) in the context of credit ratios. Definitions: Total Debt / Total Capital = Debt + (Debt + Equity) Net Debt / Net Capital = Net Debt / (Net Debt + Equity)... Read More
Net Debt to Total Capital is a mis-matched ratio. It should be Net Debt to Net Capital. References to Equity are Shareholders Equity (Book Value) in the context of credit ratios. Definitions: Total Debt / Total Capital = Debt + (Debt + Equity) Net Debt / Net Capital = Net Debt / (Net Debt + Equity)... Read More
Someone is paying attention! Very good! Section 382 of the IRS tax code only caps the NOL on the acquired NOL and not future NOLs generated. We admit it - we got lazy and didn't break it out since we hope to never generate NOLs in the future. You would modify the formula in G13 (NOL Used to Shelter... Someone is paying attention! Very good!
Section 382 of the IRS tax code only caps the NOL on the acquired NOL and not future NOLs generated. We admit it - we got lazy and didn't break it out since we hope to never generate NOLs in the future. You would modify the formula in G13 (NOL Used to Shelter Income) to:
=MAX(0,MIN(G12,G20,$E$32+G21))
In essence, add back that year's generated NOL so it's not capped.
the point of permanent differences is that the base (GAAP's EBT vs TAX's Taxable Income) is different.
for GW, GAAP's EBT would be reduced. and as such, to derive Taxable Income, add back the GW impairment to get a higher Taxable Income = pay more taxes since no tax deduct on GW amortization or GW impairment Read More