Posts by: WST Expert 1
Re: Core Model DCF - terminal cashflow
Sorry, to clarify, it is supposed to be Tax-Effected EBIT not just EBIT.
Sorry, to clarify, it is supposed to be Tax-Effected EBIT not just EBIT.
Re: Ability to Pay Analysis
This analysis doesn't require the Acquiror's information. Think back to your other set of accretion/diultion q&a. You want to calculate the point at which the additional target net income added is offset by the interest expense paid to fund the deal (in cash which is funded via debt borrowings o... Read More
This analysis doesn't require the Acquiror's information. Think back to your other set of accretion/diultion q&a. You want to calculate the point at which the additional target net income added is offset by the interest expense paid to fund the deal (in cash which is funded via debt borrowings o... Read More
Re: Estimated Taxes
You are referring to modeling out NOL (net operating losses). The basic idea is that if a company has, say $100 of NOLs that can be carried forward to deduct against future Taxable Income, this will lower future taxes. For instance, say that $100 NOL company makes $60 next year, and then $120 the ye... Read More
You are referring to modeling out NOL (net operating losses). The basic idea is that if a company has, say $100 of NOLs that can be carried forward to deduct against future Taxable Income, this will lower future taxes. For instance, say that $100 NOL company makes $60 next year, and then $120 the ye... Read More
Re: Distressed Credit Overview - Valuation questions
1) You're overthinking it. Most of these will be clarified by reading the covenants in the credit agreements of each. It is impossible to place a generalizing bucket explanation since each debt is different. This is covered extensively in our Credit Agreements & Covenants course (not yet online ... Read More
1) You're overthinking it. Most of these will be clarified by reading the covenants in the credit agreements of each. It is impossible to place a generalizing bucket explanation since each debt is different. This is covered extensively in our Credit Agreements & Covenants course (not yet online ... Read More
Re: Modeling 'Names' used in IB/PE - Question
First step is to understanding Accounting - the "language of finance". Then you need to understand basics of finance and valuation, followed by financial modeling. Go here to learn more about what is required to succeed: http://www.wallst-training.com/self-study/tracks.html Read More
First step is to understanding Accounting - the "language of finance". Then you need to understand basics of finance and valuation, followed by financial modeling. Go here to learn more about what is required to succeed: http://www.wallst-training.com/self-study/tracks.html Read More
RE: Complex Trading Comps Analysis: Fair Value of Debt
Yes, in theory, that is correct. However, as explained in our Finance 101 video in our WACC calculation, for non-distressed, going concerns, the difference between book value and market value of debt is not that large and thus, book value is used because people get lazy to get on bloomberg and look ... Read More
Yes, in theory, that is correct. However, as explained in our Finance 101 video in our WACC calculation, for non-distressed, going concerns, the difference between book value and market value of debt is not that large and thus, book value is used because people get lazy to get on bloomberg and look ... Read More
Re: Merger modeling - Purchase price allocation
No particular reason. We want to say, allocate the book value portion and whatever is left is allocated based on whatever %age we chose.
No particular reason. We want to say, allocate the book value portion and whatever is left is allocated based on whatever %age we chose.
Re: Merger modeling - Merger BS
We are confused by your question. We checked with Hamilton and he is also confused. OBSERVATION; Target BS didn't have any GW or intangibles for us to subtract!!! If it did, we would have subtracted like in the Complex LBO class!!!!! We didn't go and create a new line item on Target BS for GW or in... Read More
We are confused by your question. We checked with Hamilton and he is also confused. OBSERVATION; Target BS didn't have any GW or intangibles for us to subtract!!! If it did, we would have subtracted like in the Complex LBO class!!!!! We didn't go and create a new line item on Target BS for GW or in... Read More
Re: Estimated Taxes
Yes, correct. Now, if the company generates additional NOLs in your projected periods, then don't forget to increase NOL amount by that amount. Obviously at that point, no cash taxes since no profit (Taxable Income). And DTA up if NOL up.
Yes, correct. Now, if the company generates additional NOLs in your projected periods, then don't forget to increase NOL amount by that amount. Obviously at that point, no cash taxes since no profit (Taxable Income). And DTA up if NOL up.
The $7MM expense for amounts to retired executives is a normal, ordinary and recurring expense and thus, not to be adjusted out. Even though we don't want execs to be retiring every year, you cannot simply adjust out everything => this is indeed a normal part of business and not non-recurring. It... The $7MM expense for amounts to retired executives is a normal, ordinary and recurring expense and thus, not to be adjusted out. Even though we don't want execs to be retiring every year, you cannot simply adjust out everything => this is indeed a normal part of business and not non-recurring. It is part of regular SG&A and compensation expense.
To illustrate - an old JCP 10K has a "senior mgmt transition charge" and this is specifically related to some sr mgmt getting forced out (as opposed to retirement) => in such a case, we would make an adjustment b/c you don't want mgmt to be forced out all the time. but if normal part of business (execs retiring) then you shouldn't adjust.
More importantly, the specific note you address is related to pensions. You will always have adjustments to pension related expenses that is definitely ongoing and recurring. We have an entire class related to pension adjustments => changes in actuarial assumptions can easily manipulate GAAP pension expenses, so we consider them to be recurring, unless it's an industry like car manufacturers and airlines where the magnitude is so large, it warrants a full-day discussion. Read More